Possible conflicts between macroeconomic aims: full employment and stable prices

Resources | Subject Notes | Economics

Government Macroeconomic Intervention: Conflicts Between Aims

This section explores the role of government in managing a nation's economy, focusing on the potential conflicts that can arise when pursuing different macroeconomic objectives, particularly full employment and stable prices. Governments often face difficult choices as these aims can sometimes be at odds with each other.

Macroeconomic Aims

Governments typically have two primary macroeconomic aims:

  • Full Employment: A state where almost everyone who wants to work can find a job. This leads to higher incomes, reduced poverty, and increased social stability.
  • Stable Prices (Price Stability): Keeping inflation at a low and predictable level. Low inflation protects the purchasing power of money and encourages long-term investment.

The Phillips Curve

The Phillips Curve illustrates the inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment. The basic idea is that as unemployment falls, inflation tends to rise, and vice versa. This relationship is often represented graphically.

Suggested diagram: A simple Phillips Curve showing a negative correlation between inflation and unemployment. The curve would be labelled 'Phillips Curve'.

Explanation: When unemployment is low, there is strong demand for labour, leading to wage increases. Businesses then pass these higher costs onto consumers in the form of higher prices, resulting in inflation. Conversely, when unemployment is high, there is less pressure on wages, and businesses are less likely to raise prices, keeping inflation low.

Conflicts Between Aims

The Phillips Curve highlights the potential conflict between full employment and stable prices. Here's a breakdown of the challenges:

  1. Policies to Reduce Unemployment: Governments can use expansionary fiscal policy (increased government spending or tax cuts) or expansionary monetary policy (lower interest rates) to stimulate economic activity and reduce unemployment. However, these policies can also lead to increased demand, which can push up prices and cause inflation.
  2. Policies to Control Inflation: To control inflation, governments might need to implement contractionary fiscal policy (reduced government spending or tax increases) or contractionary monetary policy (higher interest rates). These policies can slow down economic growth and potentially increase unemployment.

Government Policies and Their Impact

Policy Type Description Impact on Unemployment Impact on Inflation
Expansionary Fiscal Policy Increased government spending or reduced taxes. Decreases unemployment. Increases inflation.
Contractionary Fiscal Policy Reduced government spending or increased taxes. Increases unemployment. Decreases inflation.
Expansionary Monetary Policy Lowering interest rates, increasing the money supply. Decreases unemployment. Increases inflation.
Contractionary Monetary Policy Raising interest rates, decreasing the money supply. Increases unemployment. Decreases inflation.

Policy Trade-offs

Governments must carefully consider the trade-offs involved when choosing between policies. There is no easy solution, and the optimal policy will depend on the specific economic circumstances and the relative importance placed on each aim. Often, governments aim for a 'Goldilocks' approach – a balance that avoids excessive inflation and excessive unemployment.

Conclusion

The pursuit of full employment and stable prices often involves difficult choices and potential conflicts. Understanding the Phillips Curve and the impact of different government policies is crucial for analyzing macroeconomic decision-making.