analyse and evaluate the evidence and reasoning used to support claims, arguments and perspectives

Resources | Subject Notes | Global Perspectives

IGCSE Global Perspectives 0457 - Research, Analysis and Evaluation

IGCSE Global Perspectives 0457 - Research, Analysis and Evaluation

This section focuses on developing your ability to critically examine information, assess the strength of arguments, and evaluate different perspectives. It's a crucial skill for success in the IGCSE Global Perspectives exam.

Understanding Claims, Arguments, and Perspectives

Claims

A claim is a statement that asserts something to be true. It's the main point someone is trying to make.

Example: "Climate change is primarily caused by human activity."

Arguments

An argument is a set of statements (premises) used to support a claim. It provides reasons and evidence for why a claim is believed to be true.

Example:

  • Premise 1: Burning fossil fuels releases greenhouse gases.
  • Premise 2: Greenhouse gases trap heat in the atmosphere.
  • Conclusion: Therefore, burning fossil fuels contributes to climate change.

Perspectives

A perspective is a particular way of looking at something, influenced by someone's background, experiences, and beliefs. Different people can have different perspectives on the same issue.

Example: The perspective of a scientist, a politician, a business owner, and an environmental activist on the same environmental issue will likely differ.

Research and Gathering Evidence

Types of Evidence

Strong arguments are supported by credible evidence. Common types of evidence include:

  • Statistical data: Numerical information (e.g., population figures, economic indicators).
  • Expert opinions: Statements from people with specialized knowledge (e.g., scientists, historians).
  • Case studies: In-depth examinations of specific examples.
  • Historical evidence: Information from the past (e.g., documents, artifacts).
  • Personal anecdotes: Individual stories or experiences.

Evaluating Sources

It's important to critically evaluate the sources of information you use. Consider the following:

  • Author's credibility: Who created the information? What are their qualifications?
  • Purpose of the source: Why was the information created? Is it to inform, persuade, or entertain?
  • Bias: Does the source have a particular viewpoint or prejudice?
  • Date of publication: Is the information up-to-date?
  • Corroboration: Is the information supported by other sources?

Analyzing Evidence and Reasoning

Identifying Reasoning

Reasoning is the process of using evidence to draw conclusions. Common types of reasoning include:

  • Deductive reasoning: Starting with general statements and drawing specific conclusions (e.g., All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.).
  • Inductive reasoning: Starting with specific observations and drawing general conclusions (e.g., Every swan I have seen is white. Therefore, all swans are white.).
  • Analogical reasoning: Comparing two things that are similar to suggest that they might be similar in other ways (e.g., If two things share several characteristics, they likely share other characteristics too.).

Assessing the Strength of Reasoning

When analyzing evidence, consider how well the reasoning supports the claim. Is the reasoning logical and sound? Are there any flaws in the reasoning?

Evaluating Perspectives

Considering Different Viewpoints

When evaluating a topic, it's important to consider different perspectives. This involves understanding how different people might see the issue based on their backgrounds and experiences.

Assessing the Validity of Perspectives

Not all perspectives are equally valid. Consider the following when evaluating different perspectives:

  • Evidence supporting the perspective: Is the perspective supported by evidence?
  • Logical consistency: Is the perspective logically consistent?
  • Potential biases: Does the perspective reflect any biases?
  • Impact of the perspective: What are the potential consequences of adopting this perspective?

Evaluating Claims, Arguments, and Perspectives

Assessing the Strength of Claims

Evaluate whether the claims being made are well-supported by evidence. Consider the quality and relevance of the evidence.

Assessing the Strength of Arguments

Evaluate the logical structure of arguments. Are the premises relevant to the conclusion? Is the reasoning sound? Are there any logical fallacies?

Comparing and Contrasting Perspectives

Compare and contrast different perspectives on a topic. Identify the strengths and weaknesses of each perspective. Consider which perspective is most persuasive and why.

Aspect Description
Claims Statements asserting truth.
Arguments Statements supporting claims with reasons and evidence.
Perspectives Different ways of viewing an issue based on background and beliefs.
Evidence Types Statistical data, expert opinions, case studies, historical evidence, anecdotes.
Reasoning Types Deductive, inductive, analogical.
Evaluation Criteria Author credibility, purpose, bias, date, corroboration.
Suggested diagram: A diagram showing the relationship between a claim, the arguments supporting it, and different perspectives on the same issue. The diagram could illustrate how evidence is used to connect claims and arguments to various viewpoints.