This question presents a debatable statement about the importance of form in relation to content. A successful response will engage with this argument, considering both sides and offering a nuanced perspective supported by textual evidence. It will not simply endorse one view but will explore the complexities of the relationship between form and content.

Possible arguments to consider:

• Supporting the argument that content is paramount: The core message, themes, and ideas are the most important aspects of a text. Form is simply a vehicle for conveying these ideas. A powerful message can be communicated effectively through simple, direct forms.
• Supporting the argument that form is significant: The form of a text actively shapes how the content is received and understood. Form can enhance meaning, create atmosphere, and reinforce themes. A carefully chosen form can amplify the impact of the content.
• A nuanced approach: Acknowledge that both content and form are interconnected and mutually influential. They work together to create a cohesive and meaningful whole. The effectiveness of a text often depends on the interplay between the two.

The answer should provide specific examples from texts to illustrate the impact of form on content, or vice versa, demonstrating a critical understanding of the relationship between the two.

This question requires an analysis of the language used in a news report, focusing on appropriateness for a general readership. A strong answer would address the following:

• Formal and Objective Tone: The language is formal and objective, avoiding emotive or subjective language. This is typical of news reporting, aiming for impartiality.
• Precise Vocabulary: Words like "unanimously," "vital," "multi-purpose," and "foster" are used to convey information accurately and avoid ambiguity.
• Balanced Reporting: The report presents both the positive aspects of the community centre (facilities, activities, community spirit) and potential concerns (parking). This demonstrates journalistic balance.
• Clear and Concise Style: The sentences are generally clear and concise, making the information easily accessible to a wide audience. Complex sentence structures are avoided.
• Use of Authority and Attribution: Attributing statements to "Council officials" and "Councillor Emily Carter" adds credibility and authority to the report.

The language is appropriate because it prioritizes clarity, accuracy, and objectivity. It avoids jargon or overly specialized vocabulary that would be inaccessible to the general public. The tone is informative and neutral, reflecting the role of a news report in conveying factual information.

This question focuses on the use of language to construct a specific identity for the speaker or writer. A strong answer will identify the linguistic features used to create this persona and explain how these features contribute to the overall effect.

Key aspects to analyze:

• Diction: Consider the writer's/speaker's choice of words – formal vs. informal, technical vs. colloquial, positive vs. negative. How does this word choice contribute to the persona?
• Syntax: Analyze sentence structure – length, complexity, use of fragments, etc. Does the syntax reflect a particular way of thinking or speaking?
• Tone: How does the tone (e.g., sarcastic, authoritative, humorous) contribute to the persona? Is the tone consistent throughout?
• Register: Consider the level of formality in the language. Does the writer/speaker adapt their language to suit the audience or context?
• Idiolect: Does the writer/speaker have a distinctive way of speaking or writing that sets them apart?

The answer should provide detailed examples of language use and explain how these choices contribute to the creation of a believable and compelling persona or voice. A table could be used to illustrate specific linguistic features and their impact.