Resources | Revision Questions | Economics
Click on a question to view the answer
Explain the difference between actual growth and potential growth in national output. Discuss the factors that might cause the gap between the two to widen or narrow.
Actual growth refers to the rate at which the economy's output (GDP) is increasing in a given period. It's the real-world figure we observe. Potential growth, on the other hand, represents the maximum sustainable rate of output an economy can achieve when all resources are fully employed – typically measured by the economy's productive capacity. It's essentially the economy's 'capacity' to produce.
The gap between actual and potential growth can widen or narrow due to several factors:
In summary, a widening gap suggests the economy is operating below its potential, potentially indicating underinvestment or structural problems. A narrowing gap suggests the economy is approaching its full capacity, which could lead to inflationary pressures.
Consider the use of renewable energy sources as a solution to resource scarcity. Assess the advantages and disadvantages of relying on renewable energy and discuss the challenges associated with its widespread adoption.
Introduction: This question focuses on a specific solution to resource scarcity – renewable energy. It requires a balanced assessment of the benefits and drawbacks of this approach, as well as the obstacles to its widespread adoption.
Advantages of Renewable Energy:
Disadvantages of Renewable Energy:
Challenges to Widespread Adoption:
Conclusion: Renewable energy offers a promising solution to resource scarcity, but its widespread adoption faces significant challenges. Overcoming these challenges requires a combination of technological innovation, policy support, and public engagement.
The government has a range of policy options available to promote economic growth. Evaluate the effectiveness of fiscal and monetary policies in achieving sustained economic growth. Consider the potential drawbacks and limitations of each.
Introduction: Economic growth is a key objective for most governments, leading to a constant search for effective policies. Fiscal and monetary policies are two of the most commonly used tools. Fiscal policy involves government spending and taxation, while monetary policy involves controlling the money supply and interest rates. Both aim to influence aggregate demand and ultimately, economic growth. However, their effectiveness can vary depending on the economic context and face limitations.
Fiscal Policy: Fiscal policy can be used to stimulate growth through increased government spending (e.g., infrastructure projects, education) or tax cuts. This increases aggregate demand (AD), leading to higher output and employment. For example, during a recession, increased government spending can directly boost demand. However, fiscal policy can be slow to implement due to political processes and bureaucratic delays. Furthermore, increased government borrowing to finance deficits can lead to higher interest rates (crowding out) and increased national debt, potentially hindering future growth. The effectiveness of fiscal policy is also debated; the multiplier effect, which suggests that an initial injection of government spending has a larger impact on GDP, is not always realized in practice. The size of the multiplier depends on factors like the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) and the propensity to import.
Monetary Policy: Monetary policy is typically managed by a central bank (e.g., the Bank of England). It primarily operates by adjusting interest rates. Lowering interest rates encourages borrowing and investment, increasing AD and stimulating growth. Conversely, raising interest rates can curb inflation but may also slow down economic growth. Monetary policy is generally considered more flexible and can be implemented more quickly than fiscal policy. However, monetary policy can be less effective during a liquidity trap, where interest rates are already near zero and further cuts have little impact. Furthermore, the effectiveness of monetary policy can be affected by consumer and business confidence; if confidence is low, even low interest rates may not stimulate borrowing and investment.
Comparison and Conclusion: Both fiscal and monetary policies have potential benefits and drawbacks. Fiscal policy can be effective in stimulating demand, but it can be slow to implement and lead to increased debt. Monetary policy is more flexible but can be less effective during a liquidity trap. The optimal policy mix depends on the specific economic circumstances. In a recession, a combination of expansionary fiscal and monetary policy may be most effective. However, policymakers must carefully consider the potential drawbacks and limitations of each policy to avoid unintended consequences. Ultimately, the effectiveness of both policies depends on factors such as consumer and business confidence, global economic conditions, and the credibility of the policymakers.