This question requires a critical evaluation of the role of democracy in addressing global challenges. It prompts students to consider whether democracy is a universally effective solution, or if other approaches are more appropriate.

Concepts to consider: Democracy, Global challenges (e.g., climate change, poverty, conflict), Governance, Human rights, International cooperation, Development, Political systems, Authoritarianism.

Perspectives to consider: Democratic idealists, Realists, Critical theorists, Different cultural perspectives on democracy, Perspectives from countries with varying degrees of democratic governance.

Evidence to consider: Examples of democratic countries successfully addressing global challenges (e.g., through international cooperation, environmental policies), Examples of democratic countries failing to address global challenges (e.g., due to political gridlock, corruption), Evidence of the impact of authoritarian regimes on global challenges (e.g., through resource exploitation, conflict), Case studies of specific global challenges and the role of democracy in addressing them (e.g., the role of democratic institutions in responding to climate change, the impact of democratic governance on poverty reduction). Consider the role of international organizations and non-state actors in addressing global challenges, regardless of the political systems of the countries involved. Explore the concept of 'illiberal democracy' and its implications.

A strong answer will acknowledge the limitations of democracy and consider alternative approaches to addressing global challenges. It should demonstrate an understanding of the complexities of global politics and the diverse range of factors that contribute to both success and failure in addressing global challenges. The answer should avoid simplistic generalizations and instead engage with the nuances of the issue.

This question requires a detailed analysis of the uneven impacts of globalization, considering its economic, social, and political dimensions. A strong answer will acknowledge the complexities of globalization and avoid simplistic generalizations.

Arguments for agreement: Globalization has facilitated the flow of capital and goods to developed countries, leading to economic growth and increased wealth. Developing countries have often become suppliers of raw materials and cheap labor, with limited benefits from trade. This has contributed to widening income inequality between countries.

Arguments for disagreement/qualification: Globalization has also provided developing countries with opportunities for economic growth through trade, investment, and technology transfer. It has led to increased access to information and education, and has empowered marginalized communities. Some developing countries have successfully integrated into the global economy and experienced significant improvements in living standards.

Evidence: Data on trade flows, foreign direct investment, and economic growth rates can be used to support the arguments. Case studies of specific countries (e.g., China, India) can illustrate the diverse impacts of globalization.

Consequences:

Evaluation: The statement is an oversimplification. While globalization has undoubtedly benefited developed countries, it has also created opportunities for developing countries. However, the benefits have not been evenly distributed, and many developing countries have faced significant challenges as a result of globalization. A more nuanced understanding of globalization is needed, recognizing both its potential benefits and its inherent risks. Policy interventions aimed at promoting fair trade, sustainable development, and equitable distribution of benefits are crucial.

This question requires a nuanced response, moving beyond simple statements about globalisation's impact. A strong answer would begin by defining globalisation – considering economic, cultural, and political dimensions. It would then explore arguments for and against the link between globalisation and inequality.

Concepts to consider: Globalisation, Inequality (economic, social, opportunity), Development, Poverty, Dependency Theory, World Systems Theory.

Perspectives to consider: Developed vs. Developing countries, Corporate perspectives, NGO perspectives, Academic perspectives (e.g., those drawing on dependency theory).

Evidence to consider: GDP growth figures, Income inequality data (e.g., Gini coefficient), Trade statistics, Migration patterns, Case studies of specific countries or regions impacted by globalisation (e.g., Bangladesh, China). Data from the World Bank, IMF, and OECD would be relevant. Consider the role of multinational corporations (MNCs) and their impact on labour practices and tax avoidance. Also, explore the role of technological change and its impact on employment and income distribution.

A good answer would acknowledge the complexities and potential counter-arguments. For example, globalisation can create opportunities for economic growth in developing countries, potentially reducing inequality in the long run. However, it can also exacerbate existing inequalities if not managed effectively. The answer should demonstrate critical evaluation of the evidence and consider different interpretations.