2.1 Networks including the internet (3)
Resources |
Revision Questions |
Computer Science
Login to see all questions
Click on a question to view the answer
1.
Question 3: Describe the advantages and disadvantages of using a point-to-point connection versus a hub-based topology in a LAN. How does the choice of topology impact network performance and reliability?
Answer:
A LAN topology refers to the physical or logical arrangement of devices within the network. Two common topologies are point-to-point and hub-based. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages.
Point-to-Point Topology: In a point-to-point topology, two devices are directly connected. This is a dedicated connection between only two nodes.
- Advantages:
- High Bandwidth: Offers dedicated bandwidth between the two connected devices.
- Security: Provides a high level of security as data is transmitted directly between the two points.
- Simple to Implement: Relatively easy to set up for a dedicated connection.
- Disadvantages:
- Limited Scalability: Not suitable for connecting multiple devices.
- Single Point of Failure: If the connection between the two devices fails, communication is lost.
Hub-Based Topology: In a hub-based topology, all devices connect to a central hub. Data transmitted to one device is broadcast to all other devices on the network.
- Advantages:
- Easy to Expand: Adding new devices is relatively simple.
- Cost-Effective: Hubs are generally inexpensive.
- Disadvantages:
- Low Bandwidth: Bandwidth is shared among all connected devices, leading to performance degradation as more devices are added.
- Security Risks: Data is broadcast to all devices, potentially compromising security.
- Single Point of Failure: If the hub fails, the entire network goes down.
Impact on Performance and Reliability:
- Performance: Point-to-point offers the best performance for dedicated communication. Hub-based topologies suffer from performance degradation as the number of devices increases due to bandwidth sharing.
- Reliability: Point-to-point is less reliable as a single point of failure can disrupt communication. Hub-based topologies are vulnerable to hub failure, which can bring down the entire network.
The choice of topology depends on the specific requirements of the network. Point-to-point is suitable for dedicated connections, while hub-based is appropriate for smaller networks where ease of expansion is a priority. Modern LANs typically use switched topologies instead of hubs to improve performance and reliability.
2.
Explain the fundamental difference between the Internet and the World Wide Web. Your answer should clearly define each term and illustrate how they relate to one another. Consider the role of protocols and services in your explanation.
The Internet is a global network of interconnected computer networks. It's the underlying infrastructure – the physical and logical connections that allow devices to communicate with each other. It relies on a suite of protocols, most notably TCP/IP, to facilitate data transmission. Think of it as the roads and highways that connect different cities.
The World Wide Web (WWW) is a system of interlinked hypertext documents accessed via the Internet. It's an application that runs *on top of* the Internet. The WWW uses HTTP (Hypertext Transfer Protocol) to transfer data, primarily HTML documents, images, and other resources. Key components of the WWW include web browsers (like Chrome, Firefox, Safari) and web servers. It's like the cars, trucks, and buses that travel on those roads – the actual content and services we access.
In essence, the Internet provides the infrastructure, while the WWW provides a way to access and share information using that infrastructure. You can have the Internet without the WWW (e.g., file sharing using FTP), but you cannot have the WWW without the Internet.
3.
Describe the advantages and disadvantages of using a client-server network model compared to a peer-to-peer network model in a business environment. Consider factors such as data security, manageability, and performance.
Client-Server in a Business Environment:
Advantages:
- Enhanced Data Security: Centralized data storage allows for robust security measures (firewalls, access control lists, encryption) to be implemented and enforced. This protects sensitive business data from unauthorized access and data breaches.
- Centralized Management: Network administration is simplified as resources and user accounts are managed from a central location. This reduces administrative overhead and improves efficiency. Software updates and patches can be deployed to all clients from the server.
- Improved Performance: Servers are typically more powerful than client machines, providing better processing power and faster access to resources. Load balancing can further improve performance by distributing traffic across multiple servers.
- Data Backup and Recovery: Centralized data storage facilitates easier data backup and recovery. Regular backups can be performed on the server, ensuring data availability in the event of a system failure.
Disadvantages:
- Higher Cost: Requires investment in server hardware, software licenses, and ongoing maintenance.
- Single Point of Failure: If the server fails, the entire network can be disrupted. Redundancy measures (e.g., RAID, failover servers) are essential to mitigate this risk, adding to the cost.
- Scalability Challenges: Scaling can be complex and expensive, requiring additional server hardware and software.
Peer-to-Peer in a Business Environment:
Advantages:
- Lower Initial Cost: No expensive server hardware or software is required.
- Easy to Set Up: P2P networks are relatively easy to set up and manage, requiring minimal technical expertise.
- Resilience: The network is more resilient to individual peer failures. If one peer goes down, the network can still function.
Disadvantages:
- Data Security Risks: Data is distributed across multiple devices, making it difficult to secure. Each peer needs to be individually secured, increasing the risk of data breaches.
- Difficult Management: Managing a P2P network can be challenging, especially as the number of peers increases. It's difficult to enforce security policies and control access to resources.
- Performance Issues: Performance can be inconsistent, as it depends on the resources available on each peer.
- Lack of Centralized Control: Difficult to implement centralized policies and control over the network.
Conclusion: For most business environments, the client-server model is generally preferred due to its superior security, manageability, and performance. However, P2P networks may be suitable for specific, limited-scope applications where cost is a primary concern and security requirements are less stringent.