The writer uses a conversational and informal tone to create a relatable and humorous effect on the reader. The use of colloquialisms like "Okay, so," "swear," and "by the way" immediately establishes a casual and personal voice. The frequent use of exclamation marks emphasizes frustration and adds to the comedic effect. The sentence structure is fragmented and informal, mirroring the stream-of-consciousness style of a typical blog post. Short, punchy sentences like "It wouldn’t connect to the Wi-Fi" and "It’s a conspiracy, I tell you!" contribute to the sense of exasperation.

The vocabulary is deliberately informal and emotive. Words like "miserable," "tantrum," and "useless" are used to express strong feelings and create a sense of empathy with the reader who has likely experienced similar frustrations. The writer employs hyperbole – exaggerating the situation ("three hours!") – to amplify the comedic effect. The use of rhetorical questions ("It's a conspiracy, I tell you!") further engages the reader and reinforces the writer's exaggerated perspective. The writer’s use of personal anecdotes and subjective opinions ("I think these tech companies...") adds to the authenticity and relatability of the piece.

In conclusion, the writer uses informal language, emotive vocabulary, and a conversational tone to create a humorous and relatable piece that resonates with readers who have experienced the frustrations of technology. The effect is to elicit empathy and amusement, rather than to present a serious or objective argument.

This question focuses on the deliberate subversion of conventions. A strong answer will identify specific conventions (e.g., narrative structure, argumentative patterns, stylistic norms) and explain how the writer or speaker deviates from them. It should then explore the potential purposes behind this manipulation.

Possible purposes could include: To challenge authority (e.g., using unconventional language to undermine traditional power structures), To create irony or satire (e.g., employing a formal style in a ridiculous situation), To convey a particular perspective or worldview (e.g., using a fragmented structure to reflect a fractured consciousness), To engage the audience in a new way (e.g., using unconventional forms to break down barriers and create a more immersive experience), or To highlight a specific theme (e.g., using a non-linear structure to represent the passage of time or the complexity of memory).

For example, a writer might deliberately use stream-of-consciousness to represent the chaotic nature of a character's thoughts. A speaker might employ a deliberately disjointed structure to reflect the breakdown of communication or the absurdity of a situation. A writer might use unconventional punctuation or grammar to challenge conventional notions of correctness and to create a distinctive stylistic effect.

The answer should provide detailed textual evidence to support its claims and demonstrate a clear understanding of the relationship between form, structure, language, and purpose. It should avoid simply identifying deviations from conventions and instead focus on explaining the why behind these choices.

This question requires a focused analysis of a specific text or speech. A strong answer will identify key features of form (e.g., narrative, dramatic, journalistic), structure (e.g., chronological, argumentative, cyclical), and language (e.g., lexical choices, grammatical structures, rhetorical devices). It should then demonstrate how these choices work together to create specific meanings and a distinctive style.

For example, when analysing a novel like Frankenstein, one might examine the epistolary form and its impact on creating a sense of immediacy and unreliable narration. The fragmented structure of the letters contributes to the novel's themes of alienation and the breakdown of communication. Mary Shelley's language, particularly her use of evocative imagery and formal diction, reinforces the gothic atmosphere and the philosophical depth of the work.

Alternatively, a speech by Martin Luther King Jr. could be analysed for its use of rhetorical devices such as repetition (e.g., "I have a dream"), metaphor, and parallelism. The carefully constructed structure, often employing a classical rhetorical pattern, enhances the speech's persuasive power and moral authority. The language is deliberately elevated and emotionally charged to inspire and motivate the audience.

The answer should not simply list features but must explain how they function to achieve particular effects and contribute to the overall meaning and style of the text/speech. It should also consider the intended audience and context.