Economic methodology (3)
Resources |
Revision Questions |
Economics
Login to see all questions
Click on a question to view the answer
1.
Question 3: Explain how the assumption of ceteris paribus is used in the production possibilities frontier (PPF). Illustrate your answer with a simple PPF diagram.
Answer: The Production Possibilities Frontier (PPF) is a graphical representation of the maximum possible combinations of two goods that an economy can produce, given its available resources and technology. The assumption of ceteris paribus is fundamental to constructing and interpreting a PPF. It means that the PPF shows the trade-offs between producing more of one good and less of another, assuming that the resources and technology used to produce both goods remain constant.
The PPF is typically drawn as a curve. Each point on the curve represents a different combination of the two goods. If the economy shifts resources from producing one good to another, the PPF will shift outwards. The slope of the PPF represents the rate of trade-off – how much of one good must be sacrificed to produce one additional unit of the other. Ceteris paribus is crucial because it allows us to isolate the effect of changes in resource allocation on the production of the two goods, without considering any other factors that might influence production.
PPF Diagram:
Capital Goods (X-axis) | Consumer Goods (Y-axis) |
(A) Initial PPF - Represents the maximum possible combinations of Capital Goods and Consumer Goods given current resources. | (B) Movement along the PPF - Represents a trade-off. To produce more Capital Goods, we must produce fewer Consumer Goods. | (C) PPF Shift - An increase in resources (e.g., more labor, capital) would cause the PPF to shift outwards, allowing for the production of more of both goods. |
|
2.
Question 1: 'Economics is not simply about the allocation of scarce resources; it is fundamentally a social science concerned with human behaviour and its consequences.' To what extent do you agree with this statement? (12 marks)
Answer: This question requires a nuanced response, acknowledging both the core economic principles of scarcity and efficiency, and the crucial role of human behaviour and social context. While the allocation of scarce resources is a foundational element of economics, reducing it solely to this ignores the underlying motivations, biases, and social structures that shape economic decisions.
Arguments supporting the statement:
- Behavioural Economics: The rise of behavioural economics demonstrates how psychological factors (e.g., cognitive biases, framing effects) significantly influence economic choices, often deviating from the rational actor model. This highlights the importance of understanding human behaviour.
- Social Institutions: Economic outcomes are heavily influenced by social institutions like government, law, culture, and norms. These institutions shape incentives and constrain choices, demonstrating the social context of economic activity.
- Inequality and Power: Economic inequality is not just a matter of resource allocation; it's often linked to power structures, social hierarchies, and historical injustices. Understanding these social dynamics is essential for a comprehensive economic analysis.
- Public Policy: Effective public policy requires an understanding of social needs, values, and preferences. Economic policies are not neutral; they often reflect and reinforce existing social power relations.
Arguments against the statement (or qualifications):
- Rationality Assumption: Traditional economics often assumes rational actors, which can be a simplifying assumption. While useful for modelling, it doesn't fully capture the complexity of human decision-making.
- Mathematical Models: Economic models rely heavily on mathematical frameworks, which can sometimes abstract away from the messy realities of social life.
- Focus on Efficiency: A core aim of economics is often to improve efficiency in resource allocation. While this can have social consequences, the primary focus remains on economic performance.
Conclusion: While the allocation of scarce resources is a central concern of economics, it is insufficient to define it as solely an economic science. Economics is inextricably linked to human behaviour, social institutions, and power dynamics. Therefore, I largely agree with the statement, but with the caveat that the focus on efficiency should be balanced with considerations of social justice and equity. (12/12)
3.
Question 1: Define the term 'ceteris paribus' as it is used in economics. Explain why it is a crucial assumption in economic modelling.
Answer: Ceteris paribus is a Latin phrase meaning "all other things being equal". In economics, it's a fundamental assumption used when analyzing the relationship between two variables. It implies that all other factors that could affect the relationship between those variables are held constant.
It's a crucial assumption because it allows economists to isolate the impact of a single variable. Without it, it would be impossible to determine whether a change in one economic factor is truly causing a change in another, or if the change is due to the influence of other, unconsidered factors. Ceteris paribus simplifies complex real-world situations, making economic models more manageable and allowing for clearer analysis of cause and effect. For example, when examining the relationship between price and quantity demanded, we assume that consumer incomes, tastes, and prices of related goods remain constant.